References

Theoretical/Methodological

[Afr67a]Sidney N. Afriat. On a system of inequalities in demand analysis: an extension of the classical method. International Economic Review, 14(2):460–472, 1967.
[Afr67b]Sidney N. Afriat. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. International Economic Review, 8(1):67–77, 1967.
[Afr72]Sidney N. Afriat. Efficiency estimates of production functions. International Economic Review, 13(3):568–598, 1972.
[Afr12]Sidney N. Afriat. Afriat’s theorem and the index number problem. Economic Journal, 122(560):295–304, 2012.
[Agu17]Victor H. Aguiar. Random categorization and bounded rationality. Economics Letters, 159():46–52, 2017.
[AS17]Victor H. Aguiar and Roberto Serrano. Slutsky matrix norms: the size, classification, and comparative statics of bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 172:163–201, 2017.
[AU17]Juan P. Aguilera and Levent Ulku. On the maximization of menu-dependent interval orders. Social Choice and Welfare, 48(2):357–366, 2017.
[AES18]David Ahn, Federico Echenique, and Kota Saito. On path independent stochastic choice. Theoretical Economics, 13(1):61–86, 2018.
[ABM07]F. Aleskerov, D. Bouyssou, and B. Monjardet. Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
[AR15]Attila Ambrus and Kareen Rozen. Rationalising choice with multi-self models. Economic Journal, 125(585):1136–1156, 2015.
[AGH13]James Andreoni, Benjamin J. Gillen, and William Harbaugh. The power of revealed preference tests: ex-post evaluation of experimental design. Working paper, 2013.
[AS12]James Andreoni and Charles Sprenger. Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review, 102(7):3357–3376, 2012.
[AB13]Jose Apesteguia and Miguel Ballester. Choice by sequential procedures. Games and Economic Behavior, 77(1):90–99, 2013.
[AB15]Jose Apesteguia and Miguel Ballester. A measure of rationality and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 123(6):1278–1310, 2015.
[ABL17]Jose Apesteguia, Miguel Ballester, and Jay Lu. Single-crossing random utility models. Econometrica, 85(2):661–674, 2017.
[Arr59]Kenneth J. Arrow. Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica, 26(102):121–127, 1959.
[AK11]Pak Hung Au and Keiichi Kawai. Sequentially rationalizable choice with transitive rationales. Games and Economic Behavior, 73(2):608–614, 2011.
[BU15]Gent Bajraj and Levent Ulku. Choosing two finalists *and* the winner. Social Choice and Welfare, 45(4):729–744, 2015.
[BM06]Samiran Banerjee and James H. Murphy. A simplified test for preference rationality of two-commodity choice. Experimental Economics, 9(1):67–75, 2006.
[BS92]Ziv Bar-Shira. Nonparametric test of the expected utility hypothesis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(3):523–533, 1992.
[BarberaP86]Salvador Barberá and Prasanta K. Pattanaik. Falmagne and the rationalizability of stochastic choice in terms of random orderings. Econometrica, 54(3):707–715, 1986.
[BC11]Timothy K. M. Beatty and Ian A. Crawford. How demanding is the revealed preference approach to demand. American Economic Review, 101(6):2782–2795, 2011.
[BR09]B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel. Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1):51–104, 2009.
[Bew02]Truman F. Bewley. Knightian decision theory. Part I. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2):79–110, 2002. Working-paper version: 1986.
[BBD95]Charles Blackorby, Walter Bossert, and David Donaldson. Multi-valued demand and rational choice in the two-commodity case. Economics Letters, 47(1):5–10, 1995.
[BM60]H. D. Block and J. Marschak. Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. In I. Olkin, editor, Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, volume of, pages 97–132. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, edition, 1960.
[BBC08a]Laura Blow, Martin Browning, and Ian Crawford. Revealed preference analysis for characteristics models. Review of Economic Studies, 75(2):371–389, 2008.
[BBC03]Richard Blundell, Martin Browning, and Ian Crawford. Nonparametric engel curves and revealed preference. Econometrica, 71(1):205–240, 2003.
[BBC07]Richard Blundell, Martin Browning, and Ian Crawford. Imrpoving revealed preference bounds on demand responses. International Economic Review, 48(4):1227–1244, 2007.
[BBC08b]Richard Blundell, Martin Browning, and Ian Crawford. Best nonparametric bounds on demand responses. Econometrica, 76(6):1227–1262, 2008.
[Bor92]Kim C. Border. Revealed preference, stochastic dominance, and the expected utility hypothesis. Journal of Economic Theory, 56(1):20–42, 1992.
[BC17]Tilman Borgers and Yan-Min Choo. Revealed relative utilitarianism. Working paper, 2017.
[Bos93]Walter Bossert. Continuous choice functions and the strong axiom of revealed preference. Economic Theory, 3(2):777–791, 1993.
[Bos13]Walter Bossert. Every choice function is backwards-induction rationalizable. Econometrica, 81(6):2521–2534, 2013.
[BSS05]Walter Bossert, Yves Sprumont, and Kotaro Suzumura. Maximal-element rationalizability. Theory and Decision, 58(4):325–350, 2005.
[BS10]Walter Bossert and Kotaro Suzumura. Consistency, Choice and Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
[BS12]Walter Bossert and Kotaro Suzumura. Revealed preference and choice under uncertainty. SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 56(1):20–42, 2012.
[Bro87]Stephen G. Bronars. The power of non-parametric tests of preference maximization. Econometrica, 55(3):693–698, 1987.
[Bro89]Martin Browning. A nonparametric test of the life-cycle rational expectations hypothesis. International Economic Review, 30(4):979–992, 1989.
[BC98]Martin Browning and Pierre-Andre Chiappori. Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica, 66(6):1241–1278, 1998.
[BE17]Gökhan Buturak and Ozgür Evren. Choice overload and asymmetric regret. Theoretical Economics, 12(3):1029–1056, 2017.
[CD10]Andrew Caplin and Mark Dean. Search, choice, and revealed preference. Theoretical Economics, 8(1):19–48, 2010.
[CM15]Andrew Caplin and Daniel Martin. A testable theory of imperfect perception. Economic Journal, 125(582):184–202, 2015.
[CGonzalez14]Andrés Carvajal and Natalia González. On refutability of the nash bargaining solution. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 50:177–186, 2014.
[CRS04]Andrés Carvajal, Indrajit Ray, and Susan Snyder. Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: testable restrictions and identification. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 40(1-2):1–40, 2004.
[CE14]Christopher P. Chambers and Federico Echenique. On the consistency of data with bargaining theories. Theoretical Economics, 9(1):137–162, 2014.
[CE16]Christopher P. Chambers and Federico Echenique. Revealed Preference Theory. Econometric Society Monograph 56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
[CE18]Christopher P. Chambers and Federico Echenique. A characterization of combinatorial demand. Mathematics of Operations Research, 43(1):222–227, 2018.
[CES16]Christopher P. Chambers, Federico Echenique, and Kota Saito. Testing theories of financial decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 113(15):4003–4008, 2016.
[CES10]Christopher P. Chambers, Federico Echenique, and Eran Shmaya. On behavioral complementarity and its implications. Journal of Economic Theory, 145:2332–2355, 2010.
[CES11]Christopher P. Chambers, Federico Echenique, and Eran Shmaya. Testable implications of gross substitutes in demand for two goods. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(1):129–136, 2011.
[CES14]Christopher P. Chambers, Federico Echenique, and Eran Shmaya. The axiomatic structure of empirical content. American Economic Review, 104(8):2303–2319, 2014.
[CES17]Christopher P. Chambers, Federico Echenique, and Eran Shmaya. General revealed preference theory. Theoretical Economics, 12(2):493–511, 2017.
[CH12]Christopher P. Chambers and Takashi Hayashi. Choice and individual welfare. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(5):1818–1849, 2012.
[CLM16]Christopher P. Chambers, Ce Liu, and Seung-Keun Martinez. A test for risk-averse expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 163:775–785, 2016.
[CM18]Christopher P. Chambers and Alan D. Miller. Benchmarking. Theoretical Economics, 13(2):485–504, 2018.
[CDDeRock18]Laurens Cherchye, Thomas Demuynck, and Bram De Rock. Transitivity of preferences: when does it matter? Theoretical Economics, 13(3):1043–1076, 2018.
[CDHR15]Laurens Cherchye, Thomas Demuynck, Per Hjertstrand, and Bram De Rock. Revealed preference tests for weak separability: an integer programming approach. Journal of Econometrics, 186(1):129–141, 2015.
[CDR13]Laurens Cherchye, Thomas Demuynck, and Bram De Rock. Nash bargained consumption decisions: a revealed preference analysis. Economic Journal, 123(567):195–235, 2013.
[CDR14]Laurens Cherchye, Thomas Demuynck, and Bram De Rock. Revealed preference analysis for convex rationalizations on nonlinear budget sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 152:224–236, 2014.
[CRV11]Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, and Frederick Vermeulen. The revealed preference approach to collective consumption behaviour: testing and sharing rule recovery. Review of Economic Studies, 78(1):176–198, 2011.
[CRV07a]Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, and Frederic Vermeulen. Opening the black box of intrahousehold decision making: theory and nonparametric empirical tests of general collective consumption models. Journal of Political Economy, 117(6):1074–1104, 2007.
[CRV07b]Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, and Frederic Vermeulen. The collective model of household consumption: a nonparametric characterization. Econometrica, 75(2):553–574, 2007.
[CFS13]Vladimir Cherepanov, Timothy Feddersen, and Alvaro Sandroni. Rationalization. Theoretical Economics, 8(3):775–800, 2013.
[Che54]Hermann Chernoff. Rational selection of decision functions. Econometrica, 22(4):422–443, 1954.
[CR87]Pierre-André Chiappori and Jean-Charles Rochet. Revealed preferences and differentiable demand. Econometrica, 55(3):687–691, 1987.
[Cra10]Ian Crawford. Habits revealed. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4):1382–1402, 2010.
[Cuh17]Tugce Cuhadaroglu. Choosing on influence. Theoretical Economics, 12(2):477–492, 2017.
[Dan10]Eric Danan. Randomization vs selection: how to choose in the absence of preference? Management Science, 56(3):503–518, 2010.
[dCE12]Geoffroy de Clippel and Kfir Eliaz. Reason-based choice: a bargaining rationale for the attraction and compromise effects. Theoretical Economics, 7(1):125–162, 2012.
[dCR18]Geoffroy de Clippel and Kareen Rozen. Bounded rationality and limited datasets. Working paper, 2018.
[DKM17]Mark Dean, Ozgur Kibris, and Yusufcan Masatlioglu. Limited attention and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 169:93–127, 2017.
[DM16]Mark Dean and Daniel Martin. Measuring rationality with the minimum cost of revealed preference violations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3):524–534, 2016.
[DP14]Rahul Deb and Mallesh M. Pai. The geometry of revealed preference. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 50:203–207, 2014.
[Deb60]Gerard Debreu. Review of `Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis’ by R. D. Luce. American Economic Review, 50:186–188, 1960.
[DS18]Thomas Demuynck and Christian Seel. Revealed preference with limited consideration. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(1):102–131, 2018.
[Die73]Walter E. Diewert. Afriat and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies, 40(3):419–425, 1973.
[Die12]Walter E. Diewert. Afriat’s theorem and some extensions to choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 122(560):305–331, 2012.
[DH15]Rohan Dutta and Sean Horan. Inferring rationales from choice. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(4):179–201, 2015.
[Dzi18a]Pawel Dziewulski. Eliciting the just-noticeable difference. Working paper, 2018.
[Dzi18b]Pawel Dziewulski. Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation for the critical cost-efficiency index. Working paper, 2018.
[Dzi18c]Pawel Dziewulski. Revealed time preference. Games and Economic Behavior, 112():67–77, 2018.
[EIS17]Federico Echenique, Taisuke Imai, and Kota Saito. Testable implications of models of intertemporal choice: exponential discounting and its generalizations. Working paper, 2017.
[ELS11]Federico Echenique, SangMok Lee, and Matthew Shum. The money pump as a measure of revealed preference violations. Journal of Political Economy, 119(6):1201–1223, 2011.
[ES15]Federico Echenique and Kota Saito. Savage in the market. Econometrica, 83(4):1467–1495, 2015.
[ES17]Federico Echenique and Kota Saito. Response time and utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 139:49–59, 2017.
[ES18]Federico Echenique and Kota Saito. General luce model. Economic Theory, 2018. forthcoming.
[EST18]Federico Echenique, Kota Saito, and Gerelt Tserenjigmid. The perception adjusted luce model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 93:67–76, 2018.
[ES08]Lars Ehlers and Yves Sprumont. Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44(1):87–94, 2008.
[EO06]Kfir Eliaz and Efe A. Ok. Indifference or indecisiveness? choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 56(1):61–86, 2006.
[ERR11]Kfir Eliaz, Michael Richter, and Ariel Rubinstein. Choosing the two finalists. Economic Theory, 46(2):211–219, 2011.
[Ell18]Andrew Ellis. Foundations for optimal inattention. Journal of Economic Theory, 173:56–94, 2018.
[EM17]Andrew Ellis and Yusufcan Masatlioglu. Framing and salience: regional preference. Working paper, 2017.
[Eps00]Larry G. Epstein. Are probabilities used in markets? Journal of Economic Theory, 91(1):86–90, 2000.
[EY85]Larry G. Epstein and Adonis J. Yatchew. Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1):149–169, 1985.
[Fam95]Melissa Famulari. A household-based, nonparametric test of demand theory. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2):372–383, 1995.
[FM09]Francoise Forges and Enrico Minelli. Afriat’s theorem for general budget sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(1):135–145, 2009.
[Fre19]David J. Freeman. Preferred personal equilibrium and choice under risk. Economic Journal, 2019. forthcoming.
[Fri16]Mira Frick. Monotone threshold representations. Theoretical Economics, 11(3):757–772, 2016.
[FIS15]Drew Fudenberg, Ryota Iijima, and Tomasz Strzalecki. Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility. Econometrica, 83(6):2371–2409, 2015.
[FS15]Drew Fudenberg and Tomasz Strzalecki. Dynamic logit with choice aversion. Econometrica, 83(2):651–691, 2015.
[Gal60]David Gale. A note on revealed preference. Economica, 27(108):348–354, 1960.
[Ger16a]Georgios Gerasimou. Asymmetric dominance, deferral and status quo bias in a behavioral model of choice. Theory & Decision, 80(2):295–312, 2016.
[Ger16b]Georgios Gerasimou. Partially dominant choice. Economic Theory, 61(1):127–145, 2016.
[Ger18]Georgios Gerasimou. Indecisiveness, undesirability and overload revealed through rational choice deferral. Economic Journal, 128(614):2450–2479, 2018.
[Gil10]Itzhak Gilboa. Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
[Gil11]Itzhak Gilboa. Making Better Decisions. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[GO91]Edward J. Green and Kent Osband. A revealed preference theory for expected utility. Review of Economic Studies, 58(4):677–695, 1991.
[GLP79]Jerry R. Green, Laurence J. Lau, and Heraklis M. Polemarchakis. Identifiability of the von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function from asset demands. In Jerry R. Green and Jose Alexandre Scheinkman, editors, General Equilibrium, Growth and Trade. Essays in Honor of Lionel McKenzie, pages 151–161. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
[GS86]Richard C. Green and Sanjay Srivastava. Expected utility maximization and demand behavior. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(2):313–323, 1986.
[Gro95]John Gross. Testing data for consistency with revealed preference. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(4):701–710, 1995.
[GNP14]Faruk Gul, Paulo Natenzon, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. Random choice as behavioral optimization. Econometrica, 82(5):1873–1912, 2014.
[GP05]Faruk Gul and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. The simple theory of temptation and self-control. Working paper, 2005.
[GP06]Faruk Gul and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. The revealed preference implications of reference dependent preferneces. Working paper, 2006.
[HPZ18]Yoram Halevy, Dotan Persitz, and Lanny Zrill. Parametric recoverability of preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 126(4):1558–1593, 2018.
[Han68]Bengt Hansson. Choice structures and preference relations. Synthese, 18(4):443–458, 1968.
[Heu11]Jan Heufer. Stochastic revealed preference and rationalizability. Theory and Decision, 71(4):575–592, 2011.
[Heu12]Jan Heufer. Testing utility maximization with error and the loss of power. German Economic Review, 13(2):161–173, 2012.
[Heu13a]Jan Heufer. Quasiconcave preferences on the probability simplex: a nonparametric analysis. Mathematical Social Sciences, 65(1):21–30, 2013.
[Heu13b]Jan Heufer. Testing revealed preference for homotheticity with two-good experiments. Experimental Economics, 16(1):114–124, 2013.
[Heu14a]Jan Heufer. Generating random optimising choices. Computational Economics, 44(3):295–305, 2014.
[Heu14b]Jan Heufer. Nonparametric comparative revealed risk aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 153:569–616, 2014.
[HH15]Jan Heufer and Per Hjertstrand. Consistent subsets: computationally feasible methods to compute the Houtman-Maks-index. Economics Letters, 128:87–89, 2015.
[HH18]Jan Heufer and Per Hjertstrand. Homothetic efficiency: theory and applications. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2018. forthcoming.
[HvanBruggen17]Jan Heufer and Paul van Bruggen. Afriat in the lab. Journal of Economic Theory, 169:546–550, 2017.
[HS14]Stefan Hoderlein and Jörg Stoye. Revealed preference in a heterogeneous population. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(2):197–213, 2014.
[Hor16]Sean Horan. A simple model of two-stage choice. Journal of Economic Theory, 162:372–406, 2016.
[HS16]Sean Horan and Yves Sprumont. Welfare criteria from choice: an axiomatic analysis. Games and Economic Behavior, 99:56–70, 2016.
[Hou50]Hendrik S. Houthakker. Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica, 17(66):159–174, 1950.
[HM85]M. Houtman and J. A. Maks. Determining all maximal data subsets consistent with revealed preference. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 19():89–104, 1985.
[HR79]Leonid Hurwicz and Marcel K. Richter. Ville axioms and consumer theory. Econometrica, 47(3):603–619, 1979.
[IS17]Yuta Inoue and Koji Shirai. Limited consideration and limited data: revealed preference tests and observable restrictions. Working paper, 2017.
[KRS02]Gil Kalai, Ariel Rubinstein, and Ran Spiegler. Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica, 70(6):2481–2488, 2002.
[KMCS76]Richard Kihlstrom, Andreu Mas-Colell, and H. Sonnenschein. The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Econometrica, 44(5):971–978, 1976.
[Kim96]Taesung Kim. Revealed preference theory on the choice of lotteries. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 26(4):463–477, 1996.
[KR86]Taesung Kim and Marcel K. Richter. Nontransitive-nontotal consumer theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(2):324–363, 1986.
[KQS18]Yuichi Kitamura, John Quah, and Jörg Stoye. Revealed price preference: theory and stochastic testing. Working paper, 2018.
[Kno93]Vicki Knoblauch. Recovering homothetic preferences. Economics Letters, 43(1):41–45, 1993.
[KU17]Matthew Kovach and Levent Ulku. Satisficing with a variable threshold. Working paper, 2017.
[KP17]Felix Kubler and Herakles Polemarchakis. The identification of beliefs from asset demand. Econometrica, 85(4):1219–1238, 2017.
[KSW14]Felix Kubler, Larry Selden, and Xiao Wei. Asset demand based tests of expected utility maximization. American Economic Review, 104(11):3459–3480, 2014.
[KSW17]Felix Kubler, Larry Selden, and Xiao Wei. What are asset demand tests of expected utility really testing. Economic Journal, 127(601):784–808, 2017.
[LQS18]Natalia Lazzati, John Quah, and Koji Shirai. A revealed preference theory of monotone choice and strategic complementarity. Working paper, 2018.
[LMNO17]Juan Lleras, Yusufcan Masatlioglu, Daisuke Nakajima, and Erkut Y. Ozbay. When more is less: limited consideration. Journal of Economic Theory, 170:70–85, 2017.
[Luc59]R. Duncan Luce. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley, 1959.
[LR57]R. Duncan Luce and Howard Raiffa. Games and Decisions. Oxford: Wiley, 1957.
[Man04]Michael Mandler. Status quo maintenance reconsidered: changing or incomplete preferences? Economic Journal, 114(499):F518–F535, 2004.
[MM07]Paola Manzini and Marco Mariotti. Sequentially rationalizable choice. American Economic Review, 97(5):1824–1839, 2007.
[MM12a]Paola Manzini and Marco Mariotti. Categorize then choose: boundedly rational choice and welfare. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(5):1141–1165, 2012.
[MM12b]Paola Manzini and Marco Mariotti. Choice by lexicographic semiorders. Theoretical Economics, 7(1):1–23, 2012.
[MM14]Paola Manzini and Marco Mariotti. Stochastic choice and consideration sets. Econometrica, 82(3):477–492, 2014.
[MMT13]Paola Manzini, Marco Mariotti, and Christopher J. Tyson. Two-stage threshold representations. Theoretical Economics, 8(3):875–882, 2013.
[MC74]Andreu Mas-Colell. Continuous and smooth consumers: approximation theorems. Journal of Economic Theory, 8(3):305–336, 1974.
[MC77]Andreu Mas-Colell. The recoverability of consumers’ preferences from market demand behavior. Econometrica, 45(6):1409–1430, 1977.
[MC78]Andreu Mas-Colell. On revealed preference analysis. Review of Economic Studies, 45(1):121–131, 1978.
[MC82]Andreu Mas-Colell. Revealed preference after Samuelson. In G. R. Feiwel, editor, Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics, pages 72–82. New York: Springer, 1982.
[MNO12]Yusufcan Masatlioglu, Daisuke Nakajima, and Erkut Y Ozbay. Revealed attention. American Economic Review, 102(5):2183–2205, 2012.
[MO05]Yusufcan Masatlioglu and Efe A. Ok. Rational choice with status quo bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 121(1):1–29, 2005.
[MO14]Yusufcan Masatlioglu and Efe A. Ok. A canonical model of choice with initial endowments. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2):851–883, 2014.
[Mat91]Rosa Matzkin. Axioms of revealed preference for non-linear budget sets. Econometrica, 59(6):1779–1786, 1991.
[MR91]Rosa Matzkin and Marcel K. Richter. Testing strictly concave rationality. Journal of Economic Theory, 53(2):287–303, 1991.
[MR04]Daniel L. McFadden and Marcel K. Richter. Stochastic rationality and revealed stochastic preference. In J. S. Chipman, D. L. McFadden, and M. K. Richter, editors, Preferences, Uncertainty and Optimality: Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz, volume of, pages 163–186. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, edition, 2004.
[MS03]Alistair Munro and Robert Sugden. On the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50(4):407–428, 2003.
[Nat19]Paulo Natenzon. Random choice and learning. Journal of Political Economy, 2019. forthcoming.
[Nis18]Hiroki Nishimura. The transitive core: inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations. Theoretical Economics, 13(2):579–606, 2018.
[NOQ17]Hiroki Nishimura, Efe A. Ok, and John Quah. A comprehensive approach to revealed preference theory. American Economic Review, 107(4):1239–1263, 2017.
[OOR15]Efe A. Ok, Pietro Ortoleva, and Gil Riella. Revealed (p)reference theory. American Economic Review, 105(1):299–321, 2015.
[Pap12]Mauro Papi. Satisficing choice procedures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84(1):451–462, 2012.
[PU15]Fernando Payro and Levent Ulku. Similarity-based mistakes in choice. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 61:152–156, 2015.
[PT17]Leandro Pejsachowicz and Severine Toussaert. Choice deferral, indecisiveness and preference for flexibility. Journal of Economic Theory, 170:417–425, 2017.
[PW94]Hans J. Peters and Peter Wakker. WARP does not imply SARP for more than two commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 62(1):152–160, 1994.
[Plo73]Charles R. Plott. Path independence, rationality and social choice. Econometrica, 41(6):1075–1091, 1973.
[PQ13]Matthew Polisson and John Quah. Revealed preference in a discrete consumption space. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(1):28–34, 2013.
[PQR17]Matthew Polisson, John Quah, and Ludovic Renou. Revealed preference over risk and uncertainty. Working paper, 2017.
[Qin17]Dan Qin. Partially dominant choice with transitive preferences. Economic Theory Bulletin, 5(2):191–198, 2017.
[Qua06]John K-H Quah. Weak axiomatic demand theory. Economic Theory, 29(3):677–699, 2006.
[Qua13]John K-H Quah. A revealed preference test for weakly separable preferences. Working paper, 2013.
[Reh04]John Rehbeck. Every choice correspondence is backwards-induction rationalizable. Games and Economic Behavior, 88:207–210, 204.
[Ren15]Philip Reny. A characterization of rationalizable consumer behavior. Econometrica, 83(1):175–192, 2015.
[Ric66]Marcel K. Richter. Revealed preference theory. Econometrica, 34(3):635–645, 1966.
[Ric71]Marcel K. Richter. Rational choice. In J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter, and H. F. Sonnenschein, editors, Preferences, Utility and Demand, pages 29–58. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.
[RW04]Marcel K. Richter and Kam-Chau Wong. Concave utility on finite sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 115(2):341–357, 2004.
[Roc87]Jean-Charles Rochet. A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16(2):191–200, 1987.
[RS06]Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant. A model of choice from lists. Theoretical Economics, 1(1):3–17, 2006.
[RS08]Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant. Some thoughts on the principle of revealed preference. In A. Caplin and A. Schotter, editors, The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, pages 116–124. Oxford University Press, 2008.
[RS12]Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant. Eliciting welfare preferences from behavioural datasets. Review of Economic Studies, 79(1):375–387, 2012.
[SR08]Yuval Salant and Ariel Rubinstein. (A, f): Choice with frames. Review of Economic Studies, 75(4):1287–1296, 2008.
[Sam38]Paul A. Samuelson. A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica, 5(17):61–71, 1938.
[Sam47]Paul A. Samuelson. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1947.
[Sch76]Thomas Schwartz. Choice functions, “rationality” conditions, and variations of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3):414–427, 1976.
[Sel91]Reinhart Selten. Properties of a measure of predictive success. Mathematical Social Sciences, 21(2):153–167, 1991.
[Sen71]Amartya Sen. Choice functions and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies, 38(3):307–317, 1971.
[Sen97]Amartya Sen. Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica, 65(4):745–779, 1997.
[Sha75]Wayne J. Shafer. Preference relations for rational demand functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 11(3):444–455, 1975.
[Sha77]Wayne J. Shafer. Revealed preference cycles and the slutsky matrix. Journal of Economic Theory, 16(2):293–309, 1977.
[SSCDeRock14]Bart Smeulders, Frits C. R. Spieksma, Laurens Cherchye, and Bram De Rock. Goodness-of-fit measures for revealed preference tests: complexity results and algorithms. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 2(1):3:1–3:16, 2014.
[Spi08]Ran Spiegler. On two points of view regarding revealed preferences and behavioral economics. In A. Caplin and A. Schotter, editors, The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook, pages 95–115. Oxford University Press, 2008.
[Spi10]Ran Spiegler. But can’t we get the same thing with a standard model? Rationalizing bounded-rationality models. Economics and Philosophy, 27(1):23–34, 2010.
[Spr00]Yves Sprumont. On the testable implications of collective choice theories. Journal of Economic Theory, 93(2):205–232, 2000.
[SSM17]Jakub Steiner, Colin Stewart, and Filip Matejka. Rational inattention dynamics: inertia and delay in decision making. Econometrica, 85(2):521–553, 2017.
[Sto15]Jörg Stoye. Choice theory when agents can randomize. Journal of Economic Theory, 155:131–151, 2015.
[Suz76]Kotaro Suzumura. Rational choice and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies, 43(1):149–158, 1976.
[Szp30]Edward Szpilrajn. Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 16(1):386–389, 1930.
[Tra09]Kenneth E. Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2009.
[Tse17]Gerelt Tserenjigmid. Choosing with the worst in mind: a reference-dependent model. Working paper, 2017.
[TK91]Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4):1039–1061, 1991.
[Tys08]Christopher J. Tyson. Cognitive constraints, contraction consistency, and the satisficing criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 138(1):51–70, 2008.
[Uza56]Hirofumi Uzawa. Note on preference and axioms of choice. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 8(1):35–40, 1956.
[Var82]Hal R. Varian. The non-parametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50(4):945–974, 1982.
[Var83]Hal R. Varian. Non-parametric tests of consumer behavior. Review of Economic Studies, 50(1):99–110, 1983.
[Var85]Hal R. Varian. Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1-2):445–458, 1985.
[Var88]Hal R. Varian. Estimating risk aversion from arrow-debreu portfolio choice. Econometrica, 56(4):973–979, 1988.
[Var90]Hal R. Varian. Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2):125–140, 1990.
[Var96]Hal R. Varian. Efficiency in production and consumption. In H. R. Varian, editor, Computational Economics and Finance: Modeling and Analysis with Mathematica, pages 131–142. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
[Var06]Hal R. Varian. Revealed preference. In M. Szenberg, L. Ramrattan, and A. A. Gottesman, editors, Samuelson Economics and the Twenty-First Century, pages 99–115. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[Var12]Hal R. Varian. Revealed preference and its applications. Economic Journal, 122(560):332–338, 2012.
[Ver12]Frederic Vermeulen. Foundations of revealed preference: introduction. Economic Journal, 122(560):287–294, 2012.
[WZ18]Katarzyna M. Werner and Horst Zank. A revealed reference point for prospect theory. Economic Theory, 2018. forthcoming.
[Yil16]Kemal Yildiz. List-rationalizable choice. Theoretical Economics, 11(2):587–599, 2016.

Empirical/Experimental

[AG11]Jason Abaluck and Jonathan Gruber. Choice inconsistencies among the elderly: evidence from plan choice in the medicare part d program. American Economic Review, 101(4):1180–1210, 2011.
[AO17]Marina Agranov and Pietro Ortoleva. Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1):40–68, 2017.
[ACGK14]David Ahn, Syngjoo Choi, Douglas Gale, and Shachar Kariv. Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quantitative Economics, 5(2):195–223, 2014.
[And03]Christopher J. Anderson. The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1):139–167, 2003.
[AM02]James Andreoni and John Miller. Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2):737–753, 2002.
[AS12]James Andreoni and Charles Sprenger. Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review, 102(7):3333–3356, 2012.
[AN16]Ned Augenblick and Scott Nicholson. Ballot position, choice fatigue and voter behaviour. Review of Economic Studies, 83(2):460–480, 2016.
[BL07]David J. Butler and Graham C. Loomes. Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 97(1):277–297, 2007.
[BL11]David J. Butler and Graham C. Loomes. Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweeness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(3):511–522, 2011.
[CCD+18]Colin Camerer, Jonathan Chapman, Mark Dean, Pietro Ortoleva, and Erik Snowberg. Econographics. Working paper, 2018.
[CDM11]Andrew Caplin, Mark Dean, and Daniel Martin. Search and satisficing. American Economic Review, 101(7):2899–2922, 2011.
[CCL+09]Gabriel D. Carroll, James C. Choi, David Laibson, Brigitte C. Madrian, and Andrew Metrick. Optimal defaults and active decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4):1639–1674, 2009.
[CR15]Elena Cettolin and Arno Riedl. Revealed incomplete preferences under uncertainty. Working paper, 2015.
[CCRV09]Laurens Cherchye, Ian Crawford, Bram De Rock, and Frederick Vermeulen. The revealed preference approach to demand. In Daniel J. Slottje, editor, Quantifying Consumer Preferences, volume 288 of Contributions to Economic Analysis, chapter 9, pages 247–279. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, 2009.
[CBG15]Alexander Chernev, Ulf Bockenholt, and Joseph Goodman. Choice overload: a conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2):333–358, 2015.
[CFGK07]Syngjoo Choi, Raymond Fisman, Douglas Gale, and Shachar Kariv. Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior uncer uncertainty. American Economic Review, 97(5):1921–1938, 2007.
[CKMS14]Syngjoo Choi, Shachar Kariv, Wieland Muller, and Dan Silverman. Who is (more) rational? American Economic Review, 104(6):1518–1550, 2014.
[CGCGT16]Miguel Costa-Gomes, Carlos Cueva, Georgios Gerasimou, and Matus Tejiscak. Choice, deferral and consistency. Working paper, 2016.
[CDeRock14]Ian Crawford and Bram De Rock. Empirical revealed preference. Annual Review of Economics, 6():503–524, 2014.
[DSMC+18]Clintin P. Davis-Stober, Denis M. McCarthy, Daniel R. Cavagnaro, Mason Price, Nicholas Brown, and Sanghyuk Park. Is cognitive impairment related to violations of rationality? a laboratory alcohol intoxication study testing transitivity of preference. Decision, 2018. forthcoming.
[Dea74]Angus S. Deaton. The analysis of consumer demand in the united kingdom: 1900-1970. Econometrica, 42(2):341–367, 1974.
[Dha97]Ravi Dhar. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2):215–231, 1997.
[DS03]Ravi Dhar and Itamar Simonson. The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2):146–160, 2003.
[DJGL11]Isaac Dinner, Eric J. Johnson, Daniel G. Goldstein, and Kaiya Liu. Partitioning default effects: why people choose not to choose. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4):332–341, 2011.
[DQ94]Steve Dowrick and John Quigin. International comparisons of living standards and tastes: a revealed-preference analysis. American Economic Review, 84(1):332–341, 1994.
[FW03]Adrian R. Fleissig and Gerald A. Whitney. A new PC-based test for varian’s weak separability conditions. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(1):133–144, 2003.
[FW07]Adrian R. Fleissig and Gerald A. Whitney. Testing additive separability. Economics Letters, 96(2):215–220, 2007.
[FW08]Adrian R. Fleissig and Gerald A. Whitney. A nonparametric test of weak separability and consumer preferences. Journal of Econometrics, 147(2):275–281, 2008.
[FM18]David Freeman and Guy Mayraz. Why choice lists increase risk taking. Experimental Economics, ():, 2018. forthcoming.
[FHK18]David J. Freeman, Yoram Halevy, and Terri Kneeland. Eliciting risk preferences using choice lists. Quantitative Economics, ():, 2018. forthcoming.
[GP79]David M. Grether and Charles R. Plott. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69(4):623–638, 1979.
[HKB01]William T. Harbaugh, Kate Krause, and Timothy R. Berry. Garp for kids: on the development of rational choice behavior. American Economic Review, 91(5):1539–1545, 2001.
[HRC16]William M. Hedgcock, Raghunath Singh Rao, and Haipang Chen. Choosing to choose: the effects of decoys and prior choice on deferral. Management Science, 62():2952–2976, 2016.
[HO94]John D. Hey and Chris Orme. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62(6):1291–1326, 1994.
[Hod11]Stefan Hoderlein. How many consumers are rational? Journal of Econometrics, 164(2):294–309, 2011.
[HPP82]Joel Huber, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1):90–98, 1982.
[IL00]Sheena S. Iyengar and Mark R. Lepper. When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6):995–1006, 2000.
[IHJ04]Sheena Sethi Iyengar, Gur Huberman, and Wei Jiang. How much choice is too much? Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In Olivia S. Mitchell and Stephen P. Utkus, editors, Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance, volume of, chapter 5, pages 83–96. New York: Oxford University Press, edition, 2004.
[KMS+12]Jeffrey R. Kling, Sendhil Mullainathan, Eldar Shafir, Lee C. Vermeulen, and Marian V. Wrobel. Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127():, 2012. 199-235.
[Kne89]Jack L. Knetsch. The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79(5):1277–1284, 1989.
[Koo63]Anthony Y. C. Koo. An empirical test of revealed preference theory. Econometrica, 31(4):646–664, 1963.
[KOF14]Ian Krajbich, Bastiaan Oud, and Ernst Fehr. Benefits of neuroeconomic modelling: new policy interventions and predictors of preference. American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings, 104(5):501–506, 2014.
[KR11]Ian Krajbich and Antonio Rangel. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(33):13852–13857, 2011.
[KZB15]Job M. T. Krijnen, Marcel Zeelenberg, and Seger M. Breugelmans. Decision importance as a cue for deferral. Judgement and Decision Making, 10(5):407–415, 2015.
[Lew01]Arthur Lewbel. Demand systems with and without errors. American Economic Review, 91(3):611–618, 2001.
[LP92]George Loewenstein and Drazen Prelec. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2):573–597, 1992.
[LOS09]Graham Loomes, Shepley Orr, and Robert Sugden. Taste uncertainty and status quo effects in consumer choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2):113–135, 2009.
[LSS91]Graham Loomes, Chris Starmer, and Robert Sugden. Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods. Econometrica, 59(2):425–439, 1991.
[LT92]Graham Loomes and Coran Taylor. Non-transitive preferences over gains and losses. Economic Journal, 102(411):357–365, 1992.
[Luc98]Mary F. Luce. Choosing to avoid: coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4):409–433, 1998.
[MS01]Brigitte C. Madrian and Dennis F. Shea. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4):1149–1187, 2001.
[Moc13]Daniel Mochon. Single-option aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3):555–566, 2013.
[RS95]D. A. Redelmeier and E. Shafir. Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4):302–305, 1995.
[RDDS11]Michel Regenwetter, Jason Dana, and Clintin P. Davis-Stober. Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118(1):42–56, 2011.
[RH09]Elena Reutskaja and Robin Hogarth. Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: when `goods satiate’. Psychology and Marketing, 26(3):197–203, 2009.
[RNCR11]Elena Reutskaja, Rosemary Nagel, Colin F. Camerer, and Antonio Rangel. Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: an eye-tracking study. American Economic Review, 101(2):900–926, 2011.
[RBM06]Jörg Rieskamp, Jerome R. Busemeyer, and Barbara A. Mellers. Extending the bounds of rationality: evidence and theories of preferential choice. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3):631–661, 2006.
[SGT10]Benjamin Scheibenhenne, Rainer Greifeneder, and Peter M. Todd. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3):409–425, 2010.
[SST93]Eldar Shafir, Itamar Simonson, and Amos Tversky. Reason-based choice. Cognition, 11(1-2):11–36, 1993.
[Sim89]Itamar Simonson. Choice based on reasons: the case of the attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2):158–174, 1989.
[Sip97]Reinhard Sippel. An experiment on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economic Journal, 107(444):1431–1444, 1997.
[Sta14]Dale O. Stahl. Heterogeneity of ambiguity preferences. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4):609–617, 2014.
[Sta98]Chris Starmer. Cycling with rules of thumb: an experimental test for a new form of non-transitive behavior. Theory & Decision, 46(2):139–158, 1998.
[SW87]James L. Swofford and Gerald A. Whitney. Nonparametric tests of utility maximization and weak separability for consumption, leisure and money. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3):458–464, 1987.
[SW88]James L. Swofford and Gerald A. Whitney. A comparison of nonparametric tests of weak separability for annual and quarterly data on consumption, leisure and money. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 6(2):241–246, 1988.
[SW94]James L. Swofford and Gerald A. Whitney. A revealed preference test for weakly separable utility maximization with incomplete adjustment. Journal of Econometrics, 60(1-2):235–249, 1994.
[Tou18]Séverine Toussaert. Eliciting temptation and self-control through menu choices: a lab experiment. Econometrica, 86(3):859–889, 2018.
[TK92]Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297–323, 1992.
[TS92]Amos Tversky and Eldar Shafir. Choice under conflict: the dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6):358–361, 1992.
[TSK90]Amos Tversky, Paul Slovic, and Daniel Kahneman. The causes of preference reversals. American Economic Review, 80(1):204–217, 1990.
[Zak84]Dan Zakay. “To choose or not to choose”: On choice strategy in face of a single alternative. American Journal of Psychology, 97(3):373–389, 1984.